MAIN FEEDS
r/neoliberal • u/namey-name-name NASA • Jul 31 '24
View all comments
Show parent comments
73
The Lancet piece was not peer reviewed I believe.
71 u/[deleted] Jul 31 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 24 u/Currymvp2 unflaired Jul 31 '24 edited Jul 31 '24 Not only was it not peer reviewed, it was essentially a letter to the editor predicting a possible future indirect death total of 180k. he's not talklng about that one. you're conflating two different things he's talking about this https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext 5 u/adreamofhodor Jul 31 '24 Thank you, you’re correct.
71
[removed] — view removed comment
24 u/Currymvp2 unflaired Jul 31 '24 edited Jul 31 '24 Not only was it not peer reviewed, it was essentially a letter to the editor predicting a possible future indirect death total of 180k. he's not talklng about that one. you're conflating two different things he's talking about this https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext 5 u/adreamofhodor Jul 31 '24 Thank you, you’re correct.
24
Not only was it not peer reviewed, it was essentially a letter to the editor predicting a possible future indirect death total of 180k.
he's not talklng about that one. you're conflating two different things
he's talking about this
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext
5 u/adreamofhodor Jul 31 '24 Thank you, you’re correct.
5
Thank you, you’re correct.
73
u/IPTV241 Jul 31 '24
The Lancet piece was not peer reviewed I believe.