MAIN FEEDS
r/neoliberal • u/namey-name-name NASA • Jul 31 '24
View all comments
Show parent comments
6
I thought there was some new research that said they were reliable? Or is that referring to the revisited numbers?
74 u/IPTV241 Jul 31 '24 The Lancet piece was not peer reviewed I believe. 66 u/[deleted] Jul 31 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 25 u/Currymvp2 unflaired Jul 31 '24 edited Jul 31 '24 Not only was it not peer reviewed, it was essentially a letter to the editor predicting a possible future indirect death total of 180k. he's not talklng about that one. you're conflating two different things he's talking about this https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext 7 u/adreamofhodor Jul 31 '24 Thank you, you’re correct.
74
The Lancet piece was not peer reviewed I believe.
66 u/[deleted] Jul 31 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 25 u/Currymvp2 unflaired Jul 31 '24 edited Jul 31 '24 Not only was it not peer reviewed, it was essentially a letter to the editor predicting a possible future indirect death total of 180k. he's not talklng about that one. you're conflating two different things he's talking about this https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext 7 u/adreamofhodor Jul 31 '24 Thank you, you’re correct.
66
[removed] — view removed comment
25 u/Currymvp2 unflaired Jul 31 '24 edited Jul 31 '24 Not only was it not peer reviewed, it was essentially a letter to the editor predicting a possible future indirect death total of 180k. he's not talklng about that one. you're conflating two different things he's talking about this https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext 7 u/adreamofhodor Jul 31 '24 Thank you, you’re correct.
25
Not only was it not peer reviewed, it was essentially a letter to the editor predicting a possible future indirect death total of 180k.
he's not talklng about that one. you're conflating two different things
he's talking about this
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext
7 u/adreamofhodor Jul 31 '24 Thank you, you’re correct.
7
Thank you, you’re correct.
6
u/ThePevster Milton Friedman Jul 31 '24
I thought there was some new research that said they were reliable? Or is that referring to the revisited numbers?