r/UFOs • u/Possible_Use3849 • 9d ago
I never believed until today Sighting
Edit: so many bullies here, I just don't see how anyone wouldn't believe after seeing. Plus it's kind of weird to think we may be the only intelligent life in the universe. I'm having admins lock this. Also for the last time I left my phone inside to charge even if I had it, it would have died before a video or picture.
I was outside, grabbing stuff out the car after me and my husband went shopping for our daughter. It was just me and him, of course I saw it first and he didn't so he's been busting my chops since. I saw a freaking ufo and I couldn't believe it. I didn't even have a phone. The weird thing is you could see search lights after I spotted it. It had blueish green lights and it was definitely a ufo I feel crazy but I figured I'd join here and let others know.
I'm sorry I didn't believe any of you who did before, but now I know it's real.
Time: ECT Location: Princeton NC Date: 12/27/24
Update: changes drone to ufo sorry if it was misleading! Update: https://imgur.com/gallery/art-EZZ9mtm
I drew this image above I am by no means an artist but this is what I saw.
1
u/Prestigious_Bug583 7d ago
You keep circling back to this idea that no one can question claims without reading this specific book. That’s fundamentally flawed reasoning.
The principles of skeptical inquiry and standards of evidence exist independently of any particular book. I don’t need to read Hastings’ work to discuss how we evaluate extraordinary claims or what constitutes reliable evidence.
What’s actually happening here is that you’re using “LOL” and “LMAO” to dismiss basic questions about methodology while refusing to engage with any specific evidence. If the book contains compelling evidence, you should be able to present it and have it stand up to scrutiny.
This isn’t about whether I’ve read the book. It’s about your consistent refusal to engage with any actual arguments while hiding behind “you haven’t read it” as some kind of universal defense against skeptical inquiry.
Notice how in all these exchanges, you haven’t once presented any specific evidence from the book. Instead, you’ve resorted to mockery, personal attacks, and repeated appeals to authority. That’s not how we determine what’s true. That’s how we entrench beliefs without proper justification. Now present evidence, here, right now: