Mom wants teeth for her birthday due to missing back teeth which makes chewing hard. How much does one tooth implant cost?

I have not yet had any sort of normal friendship with males (Till now... aage ka pata nahi)

Every time I tried to have normal friendship wala dynamic with males it ended up on not so good terms...(woh log thoda sa srk ban jaate hai dosti ke beech)....

I've been seeing a lot of comments about this and I'm kind of perplexed. What's your reasoning?

Personally, I was relieved when I heard Sony Pictures bought it. 3 (apparently) crappy franchises in DFW closed and Sony immediately reopened them and it's apparently much better now.

At the end of the day, capitalism is going to capitalism and Sony Pictures needs to make a profit but private equity? Really?

PureVPN for $1.69 per month + $300 SUB opportunity

2 offers:

1. get PureVPN to watch any countries Netflix content from anywhere in the world:

Product: http://purevpn.com/start-streaming?aff=49386152&a_bid=3ef3c756

1. Join the best VPN affiliate program for $300 SUB opportunity + lifetime recurring commissions:

Affiliate program: https://www.purevpn.com/affiliates?pAffId=49386152

Anyone have an extra Lucky Grapes? I’ve got multiple 4* duplicates for it, will trade up to three. Photos attached of my 4*

Play MONOPOLY GO! with me! Download it here: https://mply.io/5kEjHxTGEFs

talking about the 'old west' movies like the Spaghetti Western, Sergio Leone, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

I am not American, so, despite knowing these stories are supposed to be placed somewere in 'the west' of USA, i never had a clear idea on how big that area (the desertic setting with the saloons etc) was supposed to be.

There are movies set in the same time (like Ravenant) that show mountains and snow that probably belong to the north, but i am wondering about the classic Sergio Leone-style deserts.

Is it something that was just in a couple states or it interested a big part of the country?

Thrifted these yesterday, trying to figure out the date. I think it may be 03-94 but the space between the numbers is throwing me off. I can’t find many of these student jeans online with the white tab and assembled in Mexico so not sure. Thanks!

https://imgur.com/a/cpcKgjt

2000 V70 XC 2.4T, imported Canadian market car with around 200k kilometers. I only mention that because you never know if something was a little different between markets. 

Fuel pump was replaced by the dealer when the tank was dropped to replace rusted fuel lines - although I’m not sure which brand they used. My uncle, who owned the car before me, was kind of an open checkbook when it came to maintenance and basically said yes to anything the dealer recommended. In the last few years of his life he tossed $27k in parts and labor into the car, which is why I’m so adamant at keeping it running. 

My problem is a hot start issue. The car will start up on the first crank when cold, but requires multiple attempts at cranking when warm - yet it will always start eventually. Reading forums lead me to believe it was a bad check valve in the fuel pump, but in an amateur mistake I trusted that without doing proper diagnosis. 

I did pick up a fuel pressure gauge and it is quick to build pressure and holds it once the car is shut off for awhile. 

I’ve tried jumping the fuel relay but the problem persists. 

I’ve also changed out the engine coolant temperature sensor, as I was told that if it was reading cold when the engine is warm, it might flood the cylinders with too much fuel. The problem persisted after that. 

The possibility of it being a problem with the immobilizer was considered, but that was also replaced when the car was re-keyed at some point for reasons unknown to me. 

My current theory is interference from an old starter on the crank position sensor - which sounds wild, but apparently others have had the same issue and solved it by replacing the starter or re-routing the CPS wiring. I’ve tucked the wiring away a bit and it seems to have improved, but I don’t think I’ll know for sure unless I change out the starter. 

Any ideas/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

I love this sub as a place for discussion, and I’ve enjoyed seeing the different perceptions people have of the characters, plots, and overall narrative.

However, one common talking point that grinds my gears every time I see it is:

“Percy is an unreliable narrator.”

Why does it grind my gears? Because I genuinely feel like it’s not true, and it seems like a big reach of what an unreliable narrator is actually supposed to be.

By definition, an unreliable narrator is one whose perspective cannot be trusted at any point in the narrative. In practice, these are the types of narrators who you cannot count on to relay objective information or tell the truth whatsoever. These narrators often state plainly false beliefs, make delusional claims, are deeply biased/prejudiced in their conveyance of the story, and conceal and/or misinterpret information that’s vital for the reader to understand the story. Such narrators are often mentally ill, have deep-rooted prejudices that the reader notices, or are written in circumstances where lying to themselves through narration would be appropriate. These are the types of narrators that make you question every line of the story, that make you wonder if anything you’re reading actually has any truth in it…and I just don’t think that’s what Percy Jackson is?

Generally, I think people consider Percy to be an unreliable narrator because he misses context clues for certain things, or his emotions color his perception. His jealousy taints how he perceives Luke, his inability to detect social cues causes him to initially not understand Annabeth’s jealousy, so on and so forth.

But I think there’s a clear line between a narrator missing hints now and then, and their emotions framing how they perceive something…….versus them straight-up being delusional and/or lying to you. At no point in the story does it ever feel like Percy is intentionally or subconsciously trying to hide information from the reader. Unreliable narrators are usually a deliberate act by the author, and Rick Riordan wrote Percy this way not to convince you to not trust him, but to help convey Percy’s traits of being insecure and a little clueless at times. But you, as the reader, are never being intentionally misled by Percy’s narration. If something was concealed from you, it’s because it was also concealed from Percy. If something is confusing to you, it’s because it was also confusing to Percy. If something feels doubtful to you, it’s because Percy also felt doubtful. You’re reading about the social and emotional experiences about a teenage boy through the first person POV of said boy; he hasn’t deceived you in what he’s experiencing, he’s just describing his reactions to those experiences in mixture with the narration.

Besides, if we were to pretend that Percy was in fact a narrator we couldn’t trust, then it raises the question:

When can we trust his narration? What’s the standard for deciding when we should believe Percy versus when we shouldn’t?

I think this is a thoughtful question to ask because so far, it feels like people are just picking and choosing when they want to call Percy an unreliable narrator in a way that aligns with their personal feelings regarding the story. They don’t like that Luke was implied to have developed feelings for a minor, so whenever Percy states that Luke liked Annabeth romantically, they call it ‘unreliable’. But when Percy perceives the Hunters as being awful because of their recruitment of Bianca and attempted recruitment of Annabeth, his perspective is perfectly fine to be trusted, because people like it when the Hunters are viewed as ‘feminism gone wrong’. And it’s like, okay, where are we drawing the line here? When are Percy’s personal feelings on something trustworthy versus not?

And we can take it a step further: if Percy is an unreliable narrator who we can’t trust, then why is anything in the PJO universe canon? How do we know that any of what happened is real in the context of the story? What if the entire PJO saga is just an elaborate hallucination from Percy that’s gone on a little too long?

I’m just joking, of course, but the point I’m trying to make is that if we are to see Percy as being a truly unreliable narrator, that means we wouldn’t be able trust anything about the original PJO books, that we have to question all of it, that there’s nothing we can decide is fully true since we apparently can’t trust what Percy perceives to be the truth.

TL;DR: Percy is an insecure narrator who doesn’t always see the full picture right away, but I don’t think he’s unreliable, and I don’t we’re being misled about anything in the story, be it intentional or unintentional. The story is pretty clear/obvious in its hints about what’s going on; we just have a teenage boy’s mindset mixed into it.

Hey all. I (33M) had Covid-19 back in August of this year, and it caused inflammation to the point that I was having severe spinal, neck, and shoulder pain, as well as headaches, tremors, and a stutter. I was born with myelomeningocele at T12, and I am on my fourth shunt, which was last replaced in 2004.

Ever since Covid, I have had back, neck, and shoulder pain while sitting for extended periods, brain fog, excessive fatigue, heart palpitations that vary with positioning, vision changes (I just got new glasses and I’m still having blurry vision / trouble focusing in my right eye), and nausea/bloating. I also noticed the other day that when I first get on the floor from my wheelchair to shower, I stumble and fall on my butt. Weakness in my upper body/arms/shoulders to the point I can barely lift my hamper without falling forward.

At the time, they didn’t want to do anything and recommended PT/OT/Speech and pain management, which I figured probably wouldn’t work. They told me that because of my severe scoliosis, I was a very “complex” case and they wanted to see if symptoms resolved as I recovered from Covid.

I have my follow-up appointment today at TGH (Tampa, FL) with a different neurosurgeon who treats kids and adults with Spina Bifida. My MRI showed herniation down to C3-C4 and a 6mm syrinx (which I already knew about), as well as tethered spinal cord near my Spina Bifida lesion. I don’t want to rush to surgery, given my issues, but I wondered if anybody had any insight. I just want to feel better, and I feel like nobody knows my conditions well enough to really take my concerns seriously.

Thanks in advance!

Everywhere I looked online, including Fi's help section, keeps telling me this is impossible, but it's absolutely possible.
Pretty sure you have to do this from a browser, not sure if it will work on a phone browser or not, but I do it on my laptop.

1. Go to payments.google.com and sign in to your account (You may have to verify your identity)
2. Click Subscriptions & services
3. Click Manage on your active Google Fi service
4. Click Make Payment
5. From here you should be able to select a payment method, then select the option to enter another amount, and make payments in whatever amount you want with as many different cards as you please, one at a time.

I honestly have no idea why Google wants to hide this feature like it's the Holy Grail or something, but I gathered my coconuts and holy grenade and tracked it down when I needed it, so there it is if you need it as well.

Rockets get some badly needed 3 point shooting off the bench with Coby White, who is on a great contract and at 6'5 has great size to play the 1 or 2. Being just 24, he matches up with the timeline of the young guys in Houston. Since Coby can play the 2, it should free up more minutes for Aaron Holiday at backup PG who's been flat out far better than Sheppard. In fact, Coby has been better than Jalen Green the last 2 years so it gives the Rockets another option if Jalen Green is stinking it up.

The Bulls get someone who, while he has been awful, still is a promising prospect who might develop better with more consistent minutes. Also would be a solid tanking move by the Bulls replacing Coby White with Sheppard.

Hi, I am Catholic, my faith means a lot to me and I try as hard as I can at my relationship with God. However, I am mentally ill, which is hard for me to admit, and it doesn't really register in my mind that some things I think aren't okay. Like, my conscience doesn't sense some sin and it worries me immensely. I want to be able to realize that just my thoughts can also be wrong, and to feel guilty. Help?

so me and my best friend have been friends for 6-7 years now. we used to hang out all the time when we first became friends and I truly felt like she was the sister I had always wanted. our friendship has evolved a lot and our current dynamic has me contemplating our friendship altogether. to give some context me and my husband have been together for 12 years and she started dating one of our HS childhood friends about 1.5 years ago and we all hang out fairly often. more recently that has changed due to them moving further away so our communication has been all over text with the occasional driving up or down to hang out for the day. I still typically see her 2 times a month. I have a 4 month old that she had maybe seen a handful of times. but anyhow their relationship is honestly pretty toxic. they fight constantly- the only time she reaches out is to vent about her relationship drama. either that or to complain about a bad day, etc. I have addressed this multiple times in the past as she has the tendency to only talk about herself and not check in with me while I engage in conversation about her, asking questions and showing interest in her life. I feel like there isn’t enough room for me and my venting because she continues on and on about her issues while it’s hard for me to just outwardly bring up mine without being asked first. what do I do? I feel like I’m being used. she will text to vent and then not reply to me for days. what about me and my baby? do you even care how we’re doing?? advice needed

http://www.TikTok.com/t/ZTYpm6Dr4/

So my grandfather wanted to pass on some firearms this Christmas, and one I received was this double barrel Zabala 10 gauge. He had the other chokes for the barrels, but couldn't remember which was which. I noticed they are etched with 1,2,3, and 4 and wanted some help knowing which was open choke. Because, as the final pic shows, I was given two boxes of slugs as well. Now while I don't plan on scheduling shoulder replacement surgery in the near future, I do want to make sure I know if the chokes need to be fully removed or if one of them is already the open choke before I send a solid slug through it. Any help is greatly appreciated

This is for just no reason. I'm just talking to myself about what other people talk about, about working out. And, I just want you to know, that you're still not going to like what I have to say.

I'm talking about something that I've been thinking of for the last year of starting to working out again, and that's that I've not been making much progress, I've pretty much always been 125lbs, like I've tried what all you're thinking I've tried to change that, I could still do better now if I wasn't having serious money problems, buying food, possibly equipment, gym membership, protein, creatine, but mostly mass gainer. I knew this would most likely happen, and it's not likely just about to start changing because I happen to be talking about it, just don't worry about me. The thing about that, however. So, I haven't had much progress over the last year, but I'll tell you it's because of that, this is all I have to do around here. I just have been coming back here to watch how pretty much all of you really talk about working out like you do.

You know what is probably the dumbest thing being said around here? I'll tell you, it's not even coming from the ones that who actually don't even know anything about working out at all. I'm telling you it's so backwoods retarded that, as a matter of fact, I can't even believe that I'm telling you, because if I'm telling you the God's honest truth right now, it's not even like it registeres even on my radar when I see some of the dumb things some of y'all speak sometimes. It doesn't even show up for me as being terrible advice, and like it is, what you really want to ask yourself is who are the ones saying this or that, whatever, retarded crap you hear on here?

You should realize that mostly everyone here wants to be here just to make it look like they actually know or care about just fitness just as much as anyone else is likely about to believe about them. That's some weak piss, get that shit away from me. Like, who tha fuck gives an actual shit right now that you or anyone else might be right or wrong about talking about fitness some way? I get the point, you want the information to be trusted and true.

But there's more to taking your health into your hands than whether you just happen to think whether you're right. I'm here to actually talk about how the body functions and is meant to operate. The rest of you could be trying to convince me that the rocky mountains is really made of rocky road ice-cream... I couldn't give a shit less, to tell any of you the truth.

So, now do you want to hear what the most dumbest things I've been hearing on here so far in all of this time. It's quite very simple. You see, well, all of you pretty much know very little about what to actually call how you would even make your own workout plans, or you simply say exactly what everyone else does being exactly the same. And I've heard y'all talking about your workout routines before...

There must be something very wrong with you. I don't know. I'm just assuming. I don't know, would you still like to tell me why is it that all of these, workout routines, you say you would be believing in, can you tell me what the difference is between doing your workout your way and all of the every single last other working out routine that has even ever been created into this existence? Nothing, that's what. I just don't understand how you could be calling what you would be doing different any better? It's, I bet half of you right now would probably be thinking about saying to someone how you train harder, better, or more, than someone else out there, and it seriously all just leads right back to it just being about how you hope like you look like you know half of what you're even talking about here, like you'll look good if you do. And that's why I know it's shitty advice, and I haven't even told you about it yet. Everything else comes from all of you.

But, how, seriously? I don't know how some of you call what you do better for sounding more right. Anytime you tell people about what their routine should be like, it's always just don't go over 12 reps and you have to do like 6 sets. Whatever it is you people come to conclude is the best, or whatever. And, I know 12 reps to me isn't even a lot, the way I work out my lowest rep set is still more than 12. But, for y'all, how is that even supposed to be a lot? Some would trip over each other just feeling the need to tell me, "you don't want to over work and not be recovering." I'm still only on the part talking about reps. It gets even worse, and this is why I think how there's got to be no way that you haven't already been asking yourself this, these questions.

Because, then I swear to God, some of you would still dare to look me straight in the eyes with a straight face, and honestly telling me that you did everything you possibly could do, be doing better, in you doing better right now? While, you're, what you're actually telling me is that you don't know shit about shit, and you're still trying to look me straight in the eyes while just trying to tell me about how much better and harder you're training than the people the people that actually came here simply trying to learn about what they're capable of. You are so chuck full of shit, bruh. I'm sorry, I just don't know how to contain that any longer.

You have only one thing really going for you right now. And, that's, that you kinda only sorta sound pretty right half the time. But, on this, I won't be lying to any of you, I mostly think most of you have no idea what you're really trying to be right about when you are talking about fitness and working out. But, don't go getting a big head about that, you are nothing and you will always be nothing, truly, but, ..don't you get it? That's why you shouldn't be going and getting a big head about it, you don't realize that it's you that now you possess, obtaining this knowledge you've learned from fitness. There's still totally absolutely pretty much an entirely helpless civilization on this planet that is just as butt fucking retarded as any of the rest of you, so take joy in that, and stop being a dick when talking about fitness with others. That's literally all you really have to do, really.

None of this, did I happen to work out better earlier, is really helping any of you. It's because you asked, that you'll never get it. I'm not trying to say science based lifting is any different. I'm just stating the fact that unlike anyone who never asked that question, you would be the one to hope that science based lifting would have actually given you some kind of cheat skill to build free muscle. You don't even have very good arguments for science based lifting. You're just going to change how you do the exercises, which wouldn't be such a bad thing, but none of you really talk about how hard you go or how much more work that you could literally, literally, you could be doing. You simply want a better workout now and will just do anything to get it. And you actually believe it will be making a difference.

I don't know how else to tell you other than to tell you like this, hey, if you were doing everything you possibly could already with your working out, then you'd not have to even just be asking yourself that question about if that's actually a bad thing for you or not. That's what you have to learn.

So. I have something to set up, the last thing I would want to show right now. It's this, this question, what would be making a better workout in your whole opinion right now, either one, let's say you are going with doing 3 sets of 14, versus 6 sets of 11? What would be the harder to complete? Well, up until I assume right now, you're answer has been always why bother wondering about it if you're always ready to go hard every single day, hasn't it? Obviously, you're going to be the one that picks the routine that is doing 3 more sets. You don't know how much that tells about you, really. Like, bruh, you're going straight into doing 6 straight sets, while you're telling me how you're always going the hardest, telling other people sometimes that how they do and think about fitness is plain wrong because you said so even, while doing 11 hard ass reps. Like, I'm sorry, I have to be so this critical about hearing your kind of bullshit.

If I'm going into 6 sets, I don't care about the fucking reps, I need to grab a weight that I can actually use. If I'm doing 3 motha fuckin sets only, I better be God damn working with more reps and fewer sets, because that's about to be a heavy ass motha fuckin weight in my hands in the next 3 seconds. What I don't really get, however. Is how any of you can simply straight to that, like 6 sets of 12 are these magic numbers, and that's probably likely going to about to be what you're still all going to go tell the next 10,000 newbies coming through here. Then they'll start doing it. And the cycle repeats. That should not have been the very first thing to go speak to these people who know nothing. If any of you doesn't see a problem here, well, good news, this really isn't for you then, is it? I don't know, why am I talking to you, if you're just the exact one who's about to be, some of you, making my point right now, anyway. And I just wanted you to be the first to know, this isn't for you, alright.

You know who I'm really talking to here.

713361009445

#BTCUSD #60m #Crypto───────────

Ensemble model * Overview: The synthetic investment attractiveness indicator equals 13 (out of +/-100). The model ensemble suggests that trading will tend to be attractive in the nearest future. The synthetic directional indicator equals 3 (out of +/-100). The model ensemble suggests the market will move sideways in the nearest future.

Optimal past * Optimal past: The optimal lookback period for modelling is currently 516 candles. The market is currently bearish, depreciating by 3.0% during the latest phase.

Elliot Waves * Elliot Waves: The market's trend has changed and currently goes down.

• Elliot Waves Settings: Elliot Waves were updated. The current wavelength is 3.

Price Bound Modelling * HAR model at confidence level 95.0%: the HAR model forecasts volatility of 0.6369% in the next candle, the price will fluctuate around 93737.56 and with 95.0% probability will not go below 92755.11 or above 94720.01.

• BRW VaR at confidence level 95.0%: in the next candle, the price will fluctuate around 93802.83 and with 95.0% probability will not go below 92649.33 or above 94783.28.

• Historical simulation at confidence level 95.0%: in the next candle, the price will fluctuate around 93806.13 and with 95.0% probability will not go below 92659.48 or above 94786.24.

• Multifractal range at confidence level 95.0%: in the next 256 candles, the price will fluctuate around 94349.92 and with 95.0% probability will not go below 65396.66 or above 115492.53.

• Fibonacci with seven retracements: the price is likely to rebound upward from the nearest Fibonacci support of 91942.9 at the level of 0.0%. The nearest Fibonacci resistance is 95797.34 at the level of 23.6%.

• Fibonacci with five retracements: the price is likely to rebound upward from the nearest Fibonacci support of 91942.9 at the level of 0.0%. The nearest Fibonacci resistance is 98179.51 at the level of 38.2%.

• Fibonacci with four retracements: the price is likely to rebound upward from the nearest Fibonacci support of 91942.9 at the level of 0.0%. The nearest Fibonacci resistance is 98179.51 at the level of 38.2%.

• MVaR bounds at confidence level 95.0%: in the next candle, the price will fluctuate around 93794.8 and with 95.0% probability will not go below 92646.71 or above 94633.16.

Forecast * MA model at confidence level 95.0%: the MA model forecasts a return of -0.0496% in the next candle, the price will fluctuate around 93732.74 and with 95.0% probability will not go below 92288.53 or above 95176.95.

• AR model at confidence level 95.0%: the AR model forecasts a return of -0.0496% in the next candle, the price will fluctuate around 93732.74 and with 95.0% probability will not go below 92710.54 or above 94754.94.

Stability Indicators * Generalised extreme value: According to the indicator, the stability of the market is uncertain

• Power law: According to the indicator, the stability of the market is uncertain

• Student degrees of freedom: According to the indicator, the stability of the market is uncertain

• Tukey lambda: According to the indicator, the stability of the market is uncertain

Seasonality test * Seasonality test: According to the generalised seasonality test, there are no seasonal effects on the market.

Distribution analysis * Best-fit distribution: Best-fit distribution has changed, and now it is Power

───────────

Not investment advice.

#BTCUSD #60m #trading #Distribution analysis