MAIN FEEDS
r/UFOs • u/acideyezz • Jun 07 '21
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
View all comments
81
Just say it’s extraterrestrial, Jesus. They’re sure paving the pathway to that explanation, but just not confirming it. It’s very frustrating.
41 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 You'd need hard evidence to give that explanation. You can say they "might be" or "could be", but hard proof is needed to say they definitely are. Especially if such speculation might cause a panic. 21 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '21 [deleted] 11 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 You’d need 100% visibility into all programs globally both government and non-government. You could then say not humans… but you still can’t definitively say aliens yet. 11 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '21 [deleted] 4 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 edited Jun 07 '21 Remember when Iraq had WMDs. Intelligence services are not perfect. You cannot draw an assumption simply because of lack of evidence to the contrary. It’s an appeal to ignorance fallacy 10 u/LosingtheCovid19 Jun 07 '21 From my understanding WMDs was an intentional lie from the beginning no? 7 u/IchooseYourName Jun 07 '21 Yes.
41
You'd need hard evidence to give that explanation.
You can say they "might be" or "could be", but hard proof is needed to say they definitely are. Especially if such speculation might cause a panic.
21 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '21 [deleted] 11 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 You’d need 100% visibility into all programs globally both government and non-government. You could then say not humans… but you still can’t definitively say aliens yet. 11 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '21 [deleted] 4 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 edited Jun 07 '21 Remember when Iraq had WMDs. Intelligence services are not perfect. You cannot draw an assumption simply because of lack of evidence to the contrary. It’s an appeal to ignorance fallacy 10 u/LosingtheCovid19 Jun 07 '21 From my understanding WMDs was an intentional lie from the beginning no? 7 u/IchooseYourName Jun 07 '21 Yes.
21
[deleted]
11 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 You’d need 100% visibility into all programs globally both government and non-government. You could then say not humans… but you still can’t definitively say aliens yet. 11 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '21 [deleted] 4 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 edited Jun 07 '21 Remember when Iraq had WMDs. Intelligence services are not perfect. You cannot draw an assumption simply because of lack of evidence to the contrary. It’s an appeal to ignorance fallacy 10 u/LosingtheCovid19 Jun 07 '21 From my understanding WMDs was an intentional lie from the beginning no? 7 u/IchooseYourName Jun 07 '21 Yes.
11
You’d need 100% visibility into all programs globally both government and non-government.
You could then say not humans… but you still can’t definitively say aliens yet.
11 u/[deleted] Jun 07 '21 [deleted] 4 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 edited Jun 07 '21 Remember when Iraq had WMDs. Intelligence services are not perfect. You cannot draw an assumption simply because of lack of evidence to the contrary. It’s an appeal to ignorance fallacy 10 u/LosingtheCovid19 Jun 07 '21 From my understanding WMDs was an intentional lie from the beginning no? 7 u/IchooseYourName Jun 07 '21 Yes.
4 u/croninsiglos Jun 07 '21 edited Jun 07 '21 Remember when Iraq had WMDs. Intelligence services are not perfect. You cannot draw an assumption simply because of lack of evidence to the contrary. It’s an appeal to ignorance fallacy 10 u/LosingtheCovid19 Jun 07 '21 From my understanding WMDs was an intentional lie from the beginning no? 7 u/IchooseYourName Jun 07 '21 Yes.
4
Remember when Iraq had WMDs.
Intelligence services are not perfect. You cannot draw an assumption simply because of lack of evidence to the contrary.
It’s an appeal to ignorance fallacy
10 u/LosingtheCovid19 Jun 07 '21 From my understanding WMDs was an intentional lie from the beginning no? 7 u/IchooseYourName Jun 07 '21 Yes.
10
From my understanding WMDs was an intentional lie from the beginning no?
7 u/IchooseYourName Jun 07 '21 Yes.
7
Yes.
81
u/batazer Jun 07 '21
Just say it’s extraterrestrial, Jesus. They’re sure paving the pathway to that explanation, but just not confirming it. It’s very frustrating.