r/UFOs Aug 12 '23

Megathread MH370 - Relevant Posts regarding MH370 Compilation

Decided to take a break from this, this is actually consuming my life and I won't have enough time to keep up with this anymore, so I won't be updating the megathread any further.

New sub: r/AirlinerAbduction2014

Original Video from webarchive

Revisiting Supposed Military Drone Footage of UFO Airliner Abduction (This was the first post that sparked the rediscovery of the video)

The Ultimate Analysis: Airliner videos and the MH370 flight connection. (Part 1)

MH370 Airliner videos: a piece of the puzzle probably no one noticed. (Part 2)

MH370 Airliner videos part III: The rabbit hole goes deeper than we thought (Part 3)

MH370 Airliner videos part IV: New relevant information! (Part 4) (Great overall posts, covering a lot of other posts, this should be your starting point)

Objective and Thorough Analysis of the Airliner Data (original analysis, possible mh370 airplane and UAP, OP is a pilot)

NROL-22 (USA 184) satellite did pass near the coordinates shown in the video

Here are NROL-22 (USA 184) flight data from March 8th 2014

Boeing 777 Video: NROL-22 Satellite and MQ-1C Drone

New lead for proving the authenticity of the videos (WSPRnet data seems to suggest it is in fact MH370 in the video)

Airliner Satellite Video: View of the area unwrapped

Commentary on the MF370 video and FLIR from an satellite intelligence expert - and unrelated, surprising info on UAPs

Airliner Portal Video - A Mechanical Engineer's Thermal Suspicions (Top comment is worth checking out here, OP seems to dislike clicking links and informing himself on the topic)

Malaysian Prime Minister admits military radar tracked UFO near MH370 during its disappearance. Confirms UFO information stated by their Air Force chief last week. (Posted 2014)

The Curious Case of Speedbird777 (UAP Airliner) (Possible earlier upload of the video)

MH370 Clouds Anomaly

How to View that Stereoscopic Satellite Video of The Airliner In 3D

(confirmed) The airliner satellite video coordinates are over the Andaman Sea, not the Indian Ocean

4Chan Thread (includes cleaned and upscaled versions of the videos)

Here are links that aren't directly related to MH370, but provide insights on the details:

Former Marine F/A-18 pilot Mark Hulsey describes encounter with multiple orb UAPs flying in a circular pattern above his canopy (similar flight characteristics by UAP as shown in the video)

An image once thought to be too crisp to be a satellite photo ended up being mistakenly revealed intel in 2019.

I tried to recreate the airline video, I think it is nearly impossible

"I made this while drunk" titled recreation YT video of alleged MH370 UAP abduction found on ATS.com

Boeing 777 Videos: Original YouTube Uploader (Video Source) (possible link between RegicideAnon and Luke Air Force Base)

Psychic remote-viewed MH370 being teleported by NHI on March 11, 2014, a day before video of abduction allegedly made available. (very controversial, depends if you believe remote viewing as being real or not)

Russian Pilot UFO encounter 1991 (UFO took over control of jet, disabled radio, similar movement to UFOs in MH370 video) - credits to Remsey of ufoB

Edit: So that people can keep track of new posts, I'll continue to add any new posts/comments down here:

Simulating the MQ-1 Camera Pose

whitecap swells from satellite view as debunk for mh370 video similar/related to Frame-stacking the Infamous Airliner Abduction Satellite Video (possible debunk based on whitecaps in the ocean)

HEO SBIRS USA-184/NROL-122 is confirmed TASKABLE. It can be positioned to view the globe ON DEMAND. Lockheed Martin file video confirms the ability. (Confirmation that satellites are capable of the recording we've seen in the video) related to:Officially declassified, degraded images from SBIRS HEO sensors. These are the only two images ever released from USA-184 and USA-200 sensors. Yes, HEO-1 and HEO-2 have very good eyes on Earth!

Airliner Video More information (4 day Earlier upload date than the youtube one by RegicideAnon)

MH370 discussion from video/vfx hobbyist point of view

MH370 Airliner videos part IV: New relevant information! (Also added at the top to keep the 4 parts together)

MH370 Discussion - Weather imaging satellite turned off from 2AM MYT for 2 hours on March 3, 2014 (Several satellites in the area were turned off because of "keep out of zone operations") Relevant Comment Followup Post: UFO Airliner Video: Weather imaging satellite turned off "keep out zone operations" during March 8, 2015 UFO sighting video timeframe.

Airliner video shows complex treatment of depth

MH370 Airliner video is doctored. proof included. (controversial opinions in the comments whether this is actually a debunk, post below might be a reason why it's not a debunk)

MH370 Satellite Video is NOT stereoscopic 3D. This claim was based on bad data: RegicideAnon's version of the video is distorted in editing and is not 3D.

My observations on the orb/plane videos (frame rate, aspect ratio, cropping, stereo, background noise), plus 3D versions

The MH370 footage appears to be missing fuselage fins and antenna from the video Related to 0:22 in this video -- the antennae are clearly visible in optical light, but then disappear in IR.

A perspective (no pun :P) from a professional 3D artist about the MH 370 footage

Physics Can Verify the MH 370 VIDEO with Teleporting Orbs - How to prove authenticity

Airliner video shows matched noise, text jumps, and cursor drift

Were the 3 UFO's in the investigation report from 2018?! See Page 59 (More info in comment)

MH370 - All the information we have with recent discoveries

Airliner Video Artifacts Explained by Remote Terminal Access

Just putting things in perspective

Requesting the community's help reviewing a few MH370 video anomalies.

People keep calling it “the video” when it is in fact two videos that were each posted at separate times. Why is that important? Well…

There’s still no consensus on what plane/drone took the FLIR video

Found older videos of UAPs entering portals over the Popocatepetl volcano that are eerily similar to the alleged missing MH370 airliner videos

Possibly even earlier upload date? March 16, just 8 days after the incident video was not related

Speculation: Airforce is using XenClient XT to control access to Windows VM on Intel HW through the "Sureview 2.0 Architecture" for Confidential/Secret work. (There were some vulnerabilities in 2013 and 2015, indicating this video might've been leaked by a hacker)

FOIA Requests Compilation (8/15/2023)

Another wild detail. Objects in plane abduction video appear to be pulled from behindrelated comment debunking this

Massive new lead: Inmarsat data has been wrong all along - Incompetence or cover up? - peer reviewed report goes over the actual location of MH370 in r/AirlinerAbduction2014

Massive new lead: Inmarsat data has been wrong all along - Incompetence or cover up? - peer reviewed report goes over the actual location of MH370 in r/UFOs (after I posted this in the other sub I saw the mod message allowing us to post about this topic in here again, that's why I linked both posts here)

[Plane video]: A complete analysis of orb trajectories

Edit: Removed user links to create better visibility and gain some more space

2.0k Upvotes

View all comments

9

u/[deleted] Aug 16 '23

Posting this hear so hopefully more people see it:

Just to be clear, I’m leaning more towards these videos(more the satellite video than this one) being real than I am them being a hoax, but this specific point is an absolute nothing-burger on this. It’s not showing anything being pulled backwards, it’s just overlaying frames from a shaky video of a non-stationary object crimes by a non-stationary camera that is undoubtedly zoomed in(makes the image more difficult to hold stable), which we know it was, otherwise we would be seeing the UAV in the satellite video too as it would have to be relatively close to get a shot that tight.

I also want to be clear I am not claiming the OP(u/GrimZeigfeld) as being deceitful or admonishing them in some way, I am just pointing out that this rationale is not correct. I believe their intentions with that post were good with the information they thought they discovered.

This is the assertion to explain away this possibility:

Although the frames I’ve stacked are aligned with one another, the point of view was not completely static. It was filmed from a moving camera, which might cause the objects in the video to seem slightly misaligned. However, since the camera was tracking, and we are only dealing with five frames of footage here (meaning the length of time was around 0.2 seconds), the misalignment due to camera motion should be negligible. Also, in the frame just before the portal, the objects drastically warp in that direction (the only frame in which they do so) further lending itself to the idea that they are being pulled. The orb motion is also not consistent with motion blur, seeing as two move in their own circular pattern, and the center one moves in a straight line.

To start, this does not look to be a very high frame rate, maybe around 24 fps or so based on the number of frames taken and the duration of time that spans those frames in the video(if five frames is about .2 seconds, then we know that there would be about 24 frames in a second just using simple math). If you take 24 frames of continuous motion of a person running, while you are zoomed in, even with a stabilized camera, there will be a significant change from the first frame to the 5th. Sure, .2 seconds is not a lot of time, but with the camera shake and the motion of the plane and the orbs, there is a lot in motion. They even admit themselves only 2 frames catch the motion of the orbs converging, so there you have drastic movement between just two frames.

If you want to test this yourself, most phone cameras shoot at 24-30 fps when not recording in slow-mo. Go record a one second long video of a moving object(a car driving away from you at a similar angle to th UAV and this plane) handheld and then cycle through the first five frames, and to make it more realistic and accurate to the video, zoom in some first before doing so(even if you skip this part you’ll still see the movement you get). Whatever you record will undoubtedly be moving slower than this plan and will still show how much movement there is between 5 frames.

This is not showing us it being pulled, it’s just showing us a subject that is misaligned because there is significant camera shake and the subject is moving. It may have been sucked into whatever the portal looking thing is, but this method the OP used does not prove that, nor do the stacked frames demonstrate that.

I make this post to keep the conversation on this topic accurate, not to prove this is or isn’t genuine/a hoax.

3

u/Atiyo_ Aug 16 '23

Added your comment to the megathread

1

u/[deleted] Aug 16 '23

Thank you