MAIN FEEDS
r/ChatGPT • u/anestling • 21d ago
View all comments
Show parent comments
7
Because all the pieces are there for you to decide for yourself if it's real research.
I'm assuming peer review wouldn't convince you because it would just be more pdfs?
30 u/real_kerim 21d ago It's not scientific if it's not reproducible or at least somewhat consistently re-observable. You're just taking some private company's word for it. Would you also believe in the existence of Bigfoot, if I copypasted a picture of it into a PDF? 5 u/Maybe-reality842 21d ago Bigfoot = A magical, ethical, perfectly nice, non-corruptible AI (that doesn’t exist yet)? 1 u/AppleSpicer 21d ago New conspiracy theory just dropped. Bigfoot is an android confirmed
30
It's not scientific if it's not reproducible or at least somewhat consistently re-observable. You're just taking some private company's word for it.
Would you also believe in the existence of Bigfoot, if I copypasted a picture of it into a PDF?
5 u/Maybe-reality842 21d ago Bigfoot = A magical, ethical, perfectly nice, non-corruptible AI (that doesn’t exist yet)? 1 u/AppleSpicer 21d ago New conspiracy theory just dropped. Bigfoot is an android confirmed
5
Bigfoot = A magical, ethical, perfectly nice, non-corruptible AI (that doesn’t exist yet)?
1 u/AppleSpicer 21d ago New conspiracy theory just dropped. Bigfoot is an android confirmed
1
New conspiracy theory just dropped. Bigfoot is an android confirmed
7
u/FlugonNine 21d ago
Because all the pieces are there for you to decide for yourself if it's real research.
I'm assuming peer review wouldn't convince you because it would just be more pdfs?