MAIN FEEDS
r/ChatGPT • u/anestling • 21d ago
View all comments
Show parent comments
8
Because all the pieces are there for you to decide for yourself if it's real research.
I'm assuming peer review wouldn't convince you because it would just be more pdfs?
30 u/real_kerim 21d ago It's not scientific if it's not reproducible or at least somewhat consistently re-observable. You're just taking some private company's word for it. Would you also believe in the existence of Bigfoot, if I copypasted a picture of it into a PDF? 7 u/renijreddit 21d ago Has anyone tried reproducing it yet? This just happened and this is the first paper. Patience grasshopper, they'll kill us eventually. 13 u/real_kerim 21d ago Sure, but this isn't even peer-reviewed or anything. At this point, this is just some marketing material that's cosplaying as a research paper. It should be treated as such. I can write a bunch of nonsense in LaTeX, too. 2 u/renijreddit 21d ago Fair. -1 u/Leading_Passenger126 21d ago What would convince you then?
30
It's not scientific if it's not reproducible or at least somewhat consistently re-observable. You're just taking some private company's word for it.
Would you also believe in the existence of Bigfoot, if I copypasted a picture of it into a PDF?
7 u/renijreddit 21d ago Has anyone tried reproducing it yet? This just happened and this is the first paper. Patience grasshopper, they'll kill us eventually. 13 u/real_kerim 21d ago Sure, but this isn't even peer-reviewed or anything. At this point, this is just some marketing material that's cosplaying as a research paper. It should be treated as such. I can write a bunch of nonsense in LaTeX, too. 2 u/renijreddit 21d ago Fair. -1 u/Leading_Passenger126 21d ago What would convince you then?
7
Has anyone tried reproducing it yet? This just happened and this is the first paper. Patience grasshopper, they'll kill us eventually.
13 u/real_kerim 21d ago Sure, but this isn't even peer-reviewed or anything. At this point, this is just some marketing material that's cosplaying as a research paper. It should be treated as such. I can write a bunch of nonsense in LaTeX, too. 2 u/renijreddit 21d ago Fair. -1 u/Leading_Passenger126 21d ago What would convince you then?
13
Sure, but this isn't even peer-reviewed or anything. At this point, this is just some marketing material that's cosplaying as a research paper. It should be treated as such.
I can write a bunch of nonsense in LaTeX, too.
2 u/renijreddit 21d ago Fair. -1 u/Leading_Passenger126 21d ago What would convince you then?
2
Fair.
-1
What would convince you then?
8
u/FlugonNine 21d ago
Because all the pieces are there for you to decide for yourself if it's real research.
I'm assuming peer review wouldn't convince you because it would just be more pdfs?