Ai detectors suck

[u/Prs8863765]

Me and my Tutor worked on the whole essay and my teacher also helped me with it. I never even used AI. All of my friends and this class all used AI and guess what I’m the only one who got a zero. I just put my essay into multiple detectors and four out of five say 90% + human and the other one says 90% AI.

[u/ZerooGravityOfficial]

GPT lover here - why are you just taking the student's words at face value?

[u/DjawnBrowne → u/ZerooGravityOfficial]

Fellow GPT lover here. I’ve been using since the beginning (second year teacher in my early 30s).

It’s not about if the student is lying or not — it’s that the tools aren’t anywhere near good or reliable enough to prove that they are. It’s wildly unethical to use a tool so (frankly) shitty to try to hold anyone accountable for anything, and unless the teacher that wrote this response in OP’s portal has been living under a rock for the past two years, they 1000% know that.

Elsewhere in this thread, someone pointed out that the constitution comes back as 96% AI generated. I highly doubt the list of stinky old bastards that crammed themselves into Liberty Hall three hundred years ago included Claude.

So I’ll say it here openly — using AI is not technical plagiarism, we have to be able to prove plagiarism. We cannot prove anyone has used artificial intelligence to supplement their writing (or whatever else) because a reliable tool to do so doesn’t exist.

[u/Feelisoffical → u/DjawnBrowne]

The tools work quite well actually. Generally when someone swears they don’t work at all they just got caught cheating.

If someone turns in the Declaration of Independence as their own work it makes sense an AI detector would call it AI, although technically it would be plagiarism.

[u/ZerooGravityOfficial → u/Feelisoffical]

the OP literally said "all my friends were cheating, except me"..

sure bro

[u/Feelisoffical → u/ZerooGravityOfficial]

Exactly, these types of posts are generally just copes.