r/neoliberal NATO 2d ago

Trump's promise to build more warships is on a collision course with his deportation pledges News (US)

https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2025/01/trumps-promise-build-more-warships-collision-course-his-deportation-goals/401940/?oref=d1-featured-river-secondary
117 Upvotes

166

u/puukkeriro 2d ago

Trump wants to cut spending and cut taxes but doesn't want to cut defense, Medicare, Social Security. This upcoming budget cycle is going to be interesting.

219

u/Master_of_Rodentia 2d ago

He's basically the perfect representative of the electorate. You might not like it, but this is what peak democracy looks like.

46

u/puukkeriro 2d ago

I know the budget hawks in Congress are much more realistic. I recall one of them calling for a 20% cut to everything.

9

u/Numerous-Cicada3841 NATO 1d ago

The Republicans have a narrow enough majority that the budget hawks might actually get a much needed victory.

10

u/puukkeriro 1d ago

I know most leftists dislike budget hawks but given that the country spends 1 in five dollars of revenue on debt service alone, it's much needed. It's a matter of what to cut.

4

u/Yevon United Nations 1d ago

This would hurt a lot of people so it's a perfect encapsulation of what deficit hawks would do when in control.

2

u/GoldenSalm0n 1d ago

Doesn't the electorate want to cut defense?

11

u/bleachinjection John Brown 1d ago

No. They don't want "wars" but they want a "strong military."

In practical terms, as with so much else the electorate wants, it wants the jobs and the economic impact that goes with them (the actual military, defense contractors, used car dealers and strip clubs in military towns, etc.) but doesn't want the military to do military stuff.

3

u/DeepestShallows 1d ago

Along with wanting the government to be efficient and cost effective but also for government money to be focused on providing jobs and investment.

75

u/TheloniousMonk15 2d ago

Him and his morons over at DOGE will go after all these woke government programs that's costs .1% of the budget just to keep the whole "better for the economy" farce going.

34

u/Healingjoe It's Klobberin' Time 2d ago

3

u/DeepestShallows 1d ago

Well yeah, it’s always about somehow balancing the budget by cutting things people don’t like or want. Somehow. A bunch of money must be spent on unpopular, unnecessary stuff right?

Really the Democrats should have had the decency to spend a trillion a year on lesbian marriages or public libraries or something just so the Republicans have something juicy to cut.

16

u/marsexpresshydra Immanuel Kant 2d ago

Rand Paul likes 1/2 of that

31

u/Watchung NATO 2d ago

Cranked up deficient spending it is, then!

26

u/Loud-Chemistry-5056 WTO 2d ago

The most likely outcome ngl.

20

u/Inamanlyfashion Richard Posner 2d ago

🌎 πŸ‘¨β€πŸš€ πŸ”« πŸ‘¨β€πŸš€

18

u/West_Pomegranate_399 MERCOSUR 2d ago

12% deficit, just in time to plant a bomb on the laps of whoever wins 2028 and come out looking like a good president compared to either the economic crisis or massive tax hikes that come after

13

u/MuscularPhysicist John Brown 2d ago

Party of fiscal responsibility

6

u/manitobot World Bank 2d ago

Don’t worry he will just use tarrifs πŸ˜‚πŸ˜­

2

u/GoldenSalm0n 1d ago

I thought we spent like 83% of our national budget on DEI measures and red tape, at least that's what r/ conservative told me.

1

u/College_Prestige r/place '22: Neoliberal Battalion 1d ago

Fiscal conservatives don't exist when Republicans are in charge

47

u/savuporo Gerard K. O'Neill 2d ago

workforce is only one of the myriad of issues with US shipbuilding

23

u/HotTakesBeyond YIMBY 2d ago

The final product being one of the biggest issues

glares at LCS

45

u/TrixoftheTrade NATO 2d ago

American children yearn for the mines shipyards.

35

u/yellownumbersix Jane Jacobs 2d ago

Man, I wish we could get the Jones Act repealed.

Monkey's paw curls.

31

u/sponsoredcommenter 2d ago

Repealing Jones Act means cheaper transport of goods. It does not mean more US shipbuilding.

15

u/repete2024 Edith Abbott 2d ago

You think Trump would do that? Make a bunch of campaign promises without considering the logistics?

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

1

u/TheRealStepBot 2d ago

In order to do that we’d have to stop subsidizing living dispersed all over the country for whatever reason

-18

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

11

u/Snoo93079 YIMBY 2d ago

Why?

18

u/MeatPiston George Soros 2d ago

Yes lets turn down skilled labor and the chance for them to become personally invested in their new home while building civic pride.

Dumb fucking take.

-15

u/eldenpotato NASA 2d ago

They can get jobs that aren’t part of a critical industry for national security and defence

26

u/yellownumbersix Jane Jacobs 2d ago

Everyone working at Norfolk or our other shipyards has some kind of DOD security clearance commensurate to the work they are doing, contractors be they immigrants or not included.

I will go with the DOD vetting process over blanket xenophobia.

19

u/G_Platypus 2d ago

Yes, but have you considered that a toilet on a coast guard cutter was installed by a mexican?

3

u/KeithClossOfficial Jeff Bezos 2d ago

Who is going to replace them

1

u/College_Prestige r/place '22: Neoliberal Battalion 1d ago

Hey quick question, what do you consider to be not national security related? I have heard ai (which is in every tech company now), electronic hardware, chemicals, steel, food, cars, aviation, space, energy, and even garlic for some fucking reason get called vital for national security. So are immigrants supposed to restrict themselves to jobs at best buy or something?

1

u/die_hoagie MALAISE FOREVER 1d ago

Rule XI: Toxic Nationalism/Regionalism

Refrain from condemning countries and regions or their inhabitants at-large in response to political developments, mocking people for their nationality or region, or advocating for colonialism or imperialism.


If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.