r/interesting 1d ago

In the 19th century, due to the limited availability of cameras, deceased loved ones were often posed alongside living family members for photographs, creating a lasting memory of the departed HISTORY

Post image
95 Upvotes

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Hello u/Candy_sweet_xo! Please review the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder message left on all new posts)

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

51

u/myaccountgotbanmed 1d ago

Jeez that's grim. I assume the youngest one is the child who died.

11

u/JimJohnman 1d ago

Middle one actually, the one on the left just has gas.

11

u/wetlight 1d ago

They’re all dead

1

u/Ansanm 8h ago

I see dead people.

9

u/Y34rZer0 1d ago

yeah that’s what i thought.. ☹️

3

u/WonderSHIT 12h ago

I believe it's the girl second from the right. I am guessing this because she is the most clear in the photo. I saw a thing about how the picture took a long time with exposure for something. So people show up more blurry from moving during that time, while the dead don't move. Just a guess and definitely could be wrong

-4

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[deleted]

6

u/WonderSHIT 12h ago

You are rude. I was sharing my two cents with reason. She is also pretty clear in the photo and you're probably right. Fuck off now

1

u/Itchy_Dust_7410 12h ago

Bold of you to assume that!

18

u/One_Hedgehog4372 1d ago

This was known as post-mortem photography. As unsettling as the practice may seem now, it was actually considered to be a way of honouring the deceased child. Photographs were often taken with the child nestled between their other siblings or supported whilst sitting between their two parents.

15

u/Alternative_Ad_3300 1d ago

This always gave me the worst creeps.

11

u/jose_elan 1d ago

I don't get it, how do you persuade a dead kid to stand up for a photograph?

And what, they kept their dead body until the photographer was in the area?

3

u/Unusual_One_566 14h ago

The smaller girl is dead. You can see by her hands being out flat, and her head slightly tilted, as if she was in a lying position before the photo. Photographers of the time had devices that would hold up the dead for a photo. Arsenic based embalming was popular for preserving the dead. It’s interesting once you read a lot about it.

2

u/Downtown-Place8670 1d ago

Easy, it could be one the parents on their knees supporting the child behind her back. She could be tied up to a T-shaped pole. There are numerous ways to hold up a stiff body.

And usually those who were able to afford those photos were amongst the wealthiest families so the chance of having a photographer nearby would be really high. Or they did indeed a preservation of the body which also wasn't uncommon back in the days. Death was everywhere and with an average lifespan of 40 to 50, with an increased mortality rate amongst infants due to having no vaccins to diseases like red fever, measles or the pox people back then were confronted a lot by death so they had other methods of grieving as we do nowadays.

2

u/jesta030 1d ago

Thing is they only stay stiff for about 4 hours.

4

u/Downtown-Place8670 21h ago

No, that's not right, it commences about 4 hours after death sets in, reaching full stiffness at 12 hours after passing and then gradually dissipates until 72 hours later. So a body stays rather firm the first day after death, which gave them enough time to dress up the deceased, call a photographer and set them in a position.

3

u/MariaJane833 1d ago

Usually it’ll be the child that is the most clear in the photo as they do not move around during the long period of time needed to take the image

3

u/Otto-Korrect 1d ago

Also probably the one with their eyes closed. Probably.

1

u/a_boring_minimalist 16h ago

Not the case for this photo but apparently painting the eyelids to look like the eyes were open or painting the developed photo so the eyes looked open was a thing?

3

u/CharismaticCrone 11h ago

The BBC says the youngest, far left, is deceased. There are plenty of other photographs in the article.

2

u/Flaky-Scholar9535 6h ago

This isn’t freaky at all

1

u/Mister_Grimes 23h ago

Who's alive?

1

u/Unusual_One_566 14h ago

Momento Mori.

1

u/dburr10085 9h ago

It was common for families to have lots of children, and also common for them to die before their fifth birthday. In this picture, the youngest child has died and is propped against a stand for the picture

1

u/XROOR 7h ago

They edited out the flies which makes this game even more difficult

0

u/Rightbuthumble 15h ago

The one on the far right and the middle child both look dead. Their ears are black

-3

u/Shiasugar 1d ago

Girl looks happy that she’s the only girl once again.

Deceased one has a glowing aura, strangly.

-2

u/Terrible-Sink-8446 15h ago

They're all alive. This has been debunked many times.