r/apple 3d ago

iPhone 17 Design to Feature Smoother Edge-to-Rear Material Transition Rumor

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/01/06/iphone-17-design-smoother-edge-to-back/
286 Upvotes

397

u/igkeit 3d ago

If they truly go back to aluminum for the Pro models I wonder how they will sell this downgrade. They boasted about titanium being more premium etc just to go back to aluminum?

238

u/Sivalon 3d ago

Probably tie it back to their ecological causes. “This aluminum is entirely recycled, making this the closest we’ve come to a zero-carbon iPhone” or some shit.

87

u/Chiptoon 3d ago

"We're just trying to make the world a better place."

23

u/Ok_Tie7504 2d ago

And we think youre gonna like it

9

u/_____WESTBROOK_____ 2d ago

Damn this aluminum is truly a downgrade if we only like it instead of love it

1

u/Ok_Tie7504 2d ago

A YouTube review probably

8

u/Noodleholz 2d ago

They did something similar to their cables and they became very fragile. 

4

u/antigravity83 2d ago

Then wrap each product in countless amounts of cardboard and plastic and ship it around the world in gas guzzling ships, planes and trucks.

4

u/mbrady 2d ago

Is there any plastic left in iPhone packaging?

-1

u/JonDoeJoe 1d ago

The box itself has a plastic coating

1

u/antigravity83 1d ago

And plastic in the bulk packaging they send phones out in to wholesalers/retailersn

182

u/calvince 3d ago

„And because of that material choice we were able to make the iPhOnE 24 pro max ultra 0,001mm thinner, which is 150% thinner than previous models (3GS). We think you are going to love it.“

66

u/gsaura 3d ago

The best iPhone yet.

31

u/drvenkman9 3d ago

This is the fastest, most powerful iPhone we have ever released!

14

u/whymeogod 3d ago

I’m really excited to share this with you guys today!

11

u/rhunter99 3d ago

Good morning!

2

u/Bhattman93 3d ago

And we think you’ll love it!

1

u/likamuka 3d ago

Now with 3G and web apps.

5

u/TheMangusKhan 3d ago

It’s funny because I’m not sure who really cares about devices being thinner after a certain point. I thought my old iPhone 4 was plenty thin. Whenever I hear about a new model being super thin, I how much battery they sacrificed to get it that thin. When I got my M1 Pro MacBook Pro, I was pleasantly surprised it was relatively thick and even after two and a half years I can still use that thing all day without plugging it in.

26

u/Tierst 3d ago

The best aluminium iPhone we have ever made.

Done. It's all they need.

34

u/FelixTheEngine 3d ago edited 3d ago

Its new appluminum. Forged in the heat of an iPhone using Apple intelligence in 18.3 and then cooled using the tears of a test group who were shown the price of the coming Iphone 17 pro.

0

u/Zackadelllic 2d ago

With the way mine overheats, I’d guess they have a cauldron made up of a bunch of iPhone 14 Pro Max’s with more than 1 app running at a time on each.

38

u/ExactBee201 3d ago

Oh they’ll find a way to sell us Apple apple juice one day

7

u/ThatGuyFromBRITAIN 3d ago

They’ll just say it’s thinner and lighter than ever before

-4

u/TangibleCarrot 3d ago

Yep this! And I’m not against it. I’ve the iPhone 15 Pro, and while it has improved the weight of the phone i still find it too heavy. And aluminum is durable enough for me. I’d only be happy if they got rid of the glass back

12

u/FightOnForUsc 3d ago

Well they won’t get rid of the glass back because that would also be the end of wireless charging

1

u/askeladden2000 2d ago

This. I would love to have the 16pro lighter. Only thing better with steel and titanium models is the more durable coating. The structure of the phone is made of aluminum anyway on the titanium models. And that’s where most of the gram savings comes from. 

0

u/BosnianSerb31 3d ago

The EU would pitch a fit if they get rid of the glass back because it would make it incompatible with the Qi charging standard

Unless they switched to plastic, but that would be ridiculous on the pro models

19

u/SHIBA_holder 3d ago

You don’t question Apple’s skill when it comes to selling older technologies

13

u/drvenkman9 3d ago

What’s ironic is that the current pro models are already majority aluminum. The titanium is just a facade.

4

u/Chronixx 3d ago

Colors will be the way they sell it, if they give the Pros more color that is

2

u/mbrady 2d ago

"We've discovered an entirely new shade of gray."

2

u/Mother_Restaurant188 3d ago edited 3d ago

Is there any indications in the rumor for the Why behind the switch back to aluminum?

It makes no sense to me to have it for only a generation. I think it’s one of those random supplier leaks/analyses that are misinterpreted.

9

u/leo-g 3d ago

Throwing out there but it’s an alternative approach for the pane of glass concept.

Now the back glass needs to be thick to be part of the phone sandwich. My guess based on the rumours is that are reverting back to full metal iPhone without looking like metal iphone, so the back piece will be back to metal. To cover up the wireless charging holes, there will be a glass piece to hide it. Effectively the back piece is a thinner piece of glass glued on top to a thin piece of aluminium.

3

u/igkeit 3d ago

The article says it's because of "Apple's new glass-and-metal splicing material process." Maybe this process is only achievable when aluminum is used

3

u/PeakBrave8235 3d ago

What do you mean back to aluminum? Pro models have always been titanium or steel

4

u/Mother_Restaurant188 3d ago

Fixed.

So the rumor is not of a back track but a straight up downgrade from titanium all the way down to the non-Pro aluminum? That makes even less sense.

-2

u/PeakBrave8235 2d ago

you didn’t really fix it but okay lmfao

2

u/Mother_Restaurant188 2d ago

Uhmm I did lmao?

And bizarre thing to be pedantic about.

2

u/jbetances134 3d ago

The same way they always do. “This is the best iPhone ever”. But honestly, the average user doesn’t care about the difference in material. Many of us stay with iPhone for the operating system, not so much about the hardware in my opinion.

2

u/aceclown422 3d ago

They’ll probably make up a stand-in term for aluminum like ProComposite or something and then every time they have to talk about the material they can say ProComposite which is easier to make sound superior to titanium

insert we think you’re gonna love it joke here

4

u/Open_Bug_4196 3d ago

Just yesterday I was comparing the specs of my 15Pro with my old 12Pro -> 2grams of difference and the 15 pro being thicker.. yes, it’s more powerful etc but in terms of design beyond the slightly narrower edges there is no improvement

5

u/brett- 2d ago

Yeah, but the 13 and 14 were significantly heavier than the 12, at 204 and 206 grams compared to 189g for the iPhone 12.

I have a 14 pro, and its weight still annoys me every day. I still think the 11 pro was the peak of iPhone design, and hope the 17 goes back to a thinner, lighter, rounder shape.

2

u/Beneficial-Assist849 2d ago

15 Pro is almost the same in weight and size to 11 Pro. Like really really close.

1

u/brett- 2d ago

Yep, but it still has the hard flat edges of the 12-16 series, and comically large camera bump. The 11 pro just felt nice to hold, unlike every iPhone since.

I’m hoping the 17 Air brings back the features I want in a phone, which is to be so thin and light that I forget I’m carrying it, and actually be comfortable in the hand when holding it. If the speed, battery life, or camera quality has to go back a few generations to get that, I’m willing to make that sacrifice.

1

u/Beneficial-Assist849 2d ago edited 2d ago

I don’t know how familiar you are with the 15 Pro, but the edges aren’t flat. It doesn’t bite into your hand the way the 12/13/14 did. Being lighter helps too.

Personally I’ve never cared even 1% about the camera bump, but I know it irks people. The silicon case reduces it a lot.

I agree about thin and light. The 17 Air might be really tempting, but I plan on keeping the 15 Pro for a few more years.

Edit: saw you have a 14 Pro, I went from 11P - 14P - 15P and the 15P feels so much like the 11P. I hated the chonker 14P as well.

1

u/singaporesainz 2d ago

Well tbh the cut down was meant to be an iteration on the brick of a phone that the 14 pro was, with the big ass cameras and larger battery

1

u/Ekalips 3d ago

Weight? Like "the thinnest and lightest iPhone yet", boom. And just don't mention what it is made of, I bet 90% of buyers wouldn't notice

1

u/SmokedUp_Corgi 3d ago

Sounds like the camera bump will be aluminum And the back will be glass.

1

u/dccorona 3d ago

My guess is they’ll sell the advantage of making the back half aluminum (whatever that is), and say it has to be aluminum because now there’s just too much of it for weight to be reasonable with anything else. 

1

u/Lancaster61 3d ago

The weight alone could be a selling point.

1

u/shasen1235 3d ago

I would actually think this is an upgrade. Either Stainless steel or Titanium are significantly heavier than aluminum. And recent year iPhone Pro lines are like the only chucky boys in flagship market while having some of the smallest battery. If both material are that premium to Apple, they can save it cut $1~200 price and I will gladly take it any day. Hell, even if they sell both type in same price, I would still take aluminum.

1

u/ender2851 3d ago

they also talked benefit of going away from magsafe and less ports, only to return to it

1

u/SamsungAppleOnePlus 3d ago

"Our new aluminum technology is lighter, yet just as durable as titanium, while being 100 percent recycled. It's a win for everyone." - Apple, September 2025

1

u/andyayya 2d ago

Ecologic reasons Lighter material Better temperature disipation Better feel in hand (titanium feels sticky imo) Less fingerprints Less chances of breaking the glass because aluminium is not that rigid so it takes the hit instead of the glass... Cheaper.. prices stays the same another year?

Tbh I prefered the regular models since the iphone 15 with the matte glass, they look and feel better than the titanium even if it's less durable...

1

u/Matchbook0531 2d ago

Liquid retina LCD aluminum.

1

u/tempest_fiend 1d ago

When a phones main selling point is that it has titanium sides, you know it’s a gimmick thrown in because the rest of the ‘updates’ are mediocre at best and they desperately needed a sales hook

0

u/RetaliationNL 3d ago

Well I buy a lot off iPhone 16 Pro’s the titanium is so nice.

0

u/BradleyEd03 3d ago

Weight. They’ll talk about weight. In fact I guarantee they’ll talk about them being “the lightest Pro models we’ve ever made” or some shit like that lol.

0

u/two_hyun 3d ago

I have a conspiracy theory. Rumors tend to be off the longer it is from conception date. Since it’s far away from the iPhone 17 release, the rumors will be muddled. Maybe Apple is releasing an iPhone fold but rumors think it’s a thin iPhone. It makes sense. Folding phones have to be thin and using aluminum and the camera design.

0

u/rr196 2d ago

I don't think it's a fold but this Air will be the pre-cursor to the fold. Which will likely be two of these "Air" phones attached when they perfect the feel/durability of the screen with no significant crease.

-4

u/7eventhSense 2d ago

Aluminum looks more premium than Titanium. I see no difference between the regular and pro phones since titanium was used

2

u/SMFPolychronopolous 2d ago

How’s it look more premium if you can’t see the difference?

2

u/Katanae 2d ago

Agreed. The smooth frames look tacky in most colors

105

u/ReveriesinBlue 3d ago

Off-topic, but if they decide to implement the horizontal rear camera, I genuinely hope they opt for the Google Pixel protective glass over the camera modules style for a uniform appearance, rather than individual looking modules.

40

u/PradaWestCoast 3d ago

They’re not going to, concepts just always change the back design.

49

u/qaf0v4vc0lj6 3d ago

They have to stand out somehow. The three cameras are part of the iPhone branding.

16

u/ReveriesinBlue 3d ago edited 3d ago

It won’t work well with a horizontal camera setup in my opinion. I prefer uniformity, and I’ve gotten over it before, but it’d be weird unless they cover the camera modules with protective glass. It’s not the end of the world, but if they’re doing a horizontal setup, they should prioritize uniformity over brand recognition since it won’t look right here.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t buy phones for looks, and I end up throwing them into a case anyway. But if I walk into a store and see that on display, my first impression would be “Wow, that looks terrible.” But if the phone works well, then I’ll get past it quickly. Just a first impression thing.

3

u/Wizzer10 3d ago

The rumour is for a wider camera module but still in the triangular arrangement. I agree horizontal cameras would look weird.

2

u/MidnightZL1 2d ago

Gotta love the stovetop branding

7

u/Acceptable-Piccolo57 3d ago

The pixel “bar” looked great, I was hoping apple would copy it, but I can’t see these renders being accurate

8

u/ReveriesinBlue 3d ago

If Apple adopts this horizontal design, I hope it resembles Google’s approach rather than these renders.

13

u/DaringDomino3s 3d ago

I can’t see them doing three in a row horizontally unless they are giving up on spatial video or they rotate the lenses so that spatial video records horizontal while the phone is held in portrait.

1

u/0xe1e10d68 3d ago

Me personally I like it exactly as it is shown in that concept image

0

u/ReveriesinBlue 3d ago

Fair. I prefer uniformity. It would be bizarre if they made it look like these images. But it doesn’t matter. I buy a phone, put on a screen protector and case, and forget its appearance until I remove and clean the case. As long as it works well, I’d buy it, even if it initially doesn’t look great, and I don’t think the renders above looks great.

75

u/Bl4ckX_ 3d ago

Those horizontal cameras look like it’s going to be a nightmare keeping your fingers out of the pictures you take.

28

u/SiliconTheory 3d ago

They will use AI to cut out your finger in case you’re holding it wrong /s

2

u/mmmbaconbutt 2d ago

I’m imagining a robot coming to my house and cutting off my finger.

11

u/Wizzer10 3d ago

The horizontal cameras have not been rumoured, that’s an entirely speculative choice by the creator of the render.

3

u/gnulynnux 2d ago

I've never had any problems with it on a Google Pixel.

1

u/Noodleholz 2d ago

Agreed, such a layout does not make any practical sense. 

1

u/ladydeadpool24601 2d ago

Having used the recent pixels, it’s actually a nice finger placement when taking a picture. The forefinger up against the bottom of the pixel camera makes taking a picture more comfortable.

1

u/Gaycel68 2d ago

They kind of are on my Pixel 8 Pro, can confirm

0

u/AppointmentNeat 3d ago

It’s fake otherwise spatial audio won’t work.

1

u/singaporesainz 2d ago

Spatial video but yea

49

u/delebojr 3d ago

Dang, that concept is U G L Y

35

u/PeaceBull 3d ago

Ah yes the cycle of new model rumors

  1. Vague Reports of model changes
  2. Clarified reports of model changes
  3. People start making renders off of reports (in hindsight they usually misinterpreted key aspects of the leaks)
  4. Commenters hate the look (where we are)
  5. Factory part leaks
  6. Commenters get more confident about hating it
  7. Warehouse leaks
  8. Commenters get more confident about hating it
  9. Apple event release
  10. Animosity dissipates

8

u/BosnianSerb31 3d ago

Don't forget that much of 6 is seeing a factory part similar but not the same scale as the leaks and renders, so no one actually knows what it looks like until the phone releases but their expectations are set by a guy spending a day in blender lol

9

u/SufficientStrategy96 3d ago

I love how light the non-pro phones are so I’d totally be happy with aluminum

58

u/MSeager 3d ago

This has to be the most boring leak imaginable.

Apple: We made the edge slightly rounded.

Other phone manufacturers: You can unfold the phone to make a 52” TV.

99

u/Atraac 3d ago

I'm on 13 Pro and i still don't see a single reason to change for newer one. There's virtually zero progress.

64

u/Maddbass 3d ago

USB-C hits hard for me.

25

u/Youbettereatthatshit 3d ago

I had the 13 pro with 78% battery life. Part of me wanted just a new battery, but God it’s nice to really only have USBC. iPads, iPhones, Remotes, PS5 controllers, random massage gun all being able to be charged by the same cable…

Living in the future. Just happy the EU forced Apple.

-8

u/flatbuttboy 3d ago

Honestly, nothing of mine uses USB-C to charge other than my MacBook, which needs a different adapter anyway, having a USB-C iPhone would be inconvenient

18

u/PM_ME_Y0UR_BOOBZ 3d ago

When you get to 2020 levels of technology in your home, it’ll be convenient.

-3

u/flatbuttboy 2d ago

Yeah but, I am, it’s just that my AirPods Pro 2s use lightning, my iPhone 12 uses lightning, my watch uses a wireless charger(USB-A) and the only other charger I need is the USB-C for the MacBook. I have enough devices, I have recent enough devices especially but not one needs them

72

u/munchingzia 3d ago

Same. At this point im actually getting irritated that the software experience is getting WORSE with each update

16

u/lordorbit 3d ago

I have actually decided to stop with updates on iOS 18 on my iPhone 13 Pro. I dug up old iPad 3 that was never updated from some old iOS and was actually faster than my newest iPad on latest iPadOS.

3

u/cultoftheilluminati 3d ago

Looks like people are finally waking up to the fact that updates actually are making older phones worse. I’m happily sticking it out on iOS 17.0 with TrollStore on my 14 pro. Apple would have to give me a lot (unrestricted side loading for one) to even get me to start thinking about updating off of this version.

It’s much more obvious on Apple watches when this happens because of the relatively low performance and has been quite well known watchOS community at least, where older watches practically become unusable when updating to the last supported firmware. See the experience of people using series 4 watches on watchOS 10.

3

u/jtighe 3d ago

Damned if they do damned if they don’t IMO.

I also want more iteration because I love tech, but a 3 year old phone should be only incrementally behind.

6

u/Kimantha_Allerdings 3d ago

FWIW, I upgraded from a 13 Pro in September for the 16 Pro.

It's not a huge, huge upgrade by any means, but there are things you will notice. The screen is notably larger without the phone itself feeling larger, and the dynamic island is less intrusive than the notch. And it's noticably lighter, too. I don't know what the actual weight difference is, but you will definitely feel it. It feels faster and more responsive, too.

That's why I have a 3 year upgrade cycle - it's long enough that it feels like an upgrade, but it's short enough that you actually get a non-insulting amount of money back when you trade the old one in.

So not quite zero progress, but you're right that there's no particularly compelling reason to upgrade. There's nothing wrong with the 13 Pro, and you're not missing out on killer features or spec upgrades or anything like that. It's just that there is enough difference that if you were to upgrade it does feel like you've got something new and shiny rather than something exactly the same.

1

u/donkeykink420 3d ago

How‘s the difference in battery life between those two? Decided to go 16pro over a cheaper, older one or the base 16 for that but I doubt it‘s actually as much a difference as apple or salesmen would want you to believe.

1

u/Kimantha_Allerdings 3d ago

My battery had started failing on my 13PM when I traded it in, to the point where I actually had to have it replaced before I could trade it in. So I can't actually answer that, I'm afraid.

Both phones easily lasted a day when they were healthy, so neither is anything I actually noticed until the last few days of my 13 when it started noticably dying.

That said, I have Apple Intelligence turned off. I imagine having it turned on would noticably affect the battery life. So my answer now could be very different to my answer in a potential future where Apple Intelligence actually becomes decent.

1

u/alimighty1 3d ago

13 pro: 7.16 oz / 203 grams 16 pro: 7.03 / 199 grams

13 pro max: 8.39 oz / 238 grams 16 pro max: 7.99 oz / 227 grams

Just in case anyone, like me, was interested. For me the biggest savings will be going from a pro max to the regular pro when I upgrade, now that the camera is the same I don’t feel bullied into getting the max anymore.

1

u/alimighty1 3d ago

13 pro: 7.16 oz / 203 grams 16 pro: 7.03 / 199 grams

13 pro max: 8.39 oz / 238 grams 16 pro max: 7.99 oz / 227 grams

Just in case anyone, like me, was interested. For me the biggest savings will be going from a pro max to the regular pro when I upgrade, now that the camera is the same I don’t feel bullied into getting the max anymore.

1

u/Kimantha_Allerdings 3d ago

Ah, FWIW, I should say that I was talking about the Max in both cases. So 11g, which doesn't seem a lot on paper, but which you can definitely tell when you're holding it.

3

u/_HipStorian 3d ago

It really depends on what you use your phone for. I upgraded from the 13 Pro and having Log recording capabilities, USB-C / Thunderbolt connection and the memo layering feature has helped a lot with earning me some money these last couple of months.

12

u/PeakBrave8235 3d ago

I do, and one of them is the fact that newer models are satellite phones.

5

u/Atraac 3d ago

Well that's awesome for you but satellite emergency sos features are not even available in my country.

-9

u/PeakBrave8235 3d ago

Maybe one say they will be? They’ve expanded a lot all over

9

u/roman030 3d ago

and you'd buy products solely on the premise that things might be available some time?

-1

u/PeakBrave8235 2d ago

He made a claim that iPhones haven’t inteoduced anything new and i refuted that. That’s all I was saying

2

u/sevaiper 3d ago

All phones will be satellite phones soon

2

u/BosnianSerb31 3d ago

Geostationary sats are far more expensive to launch and LEO like starlink is cheap and fast but requires active tracking because the satellites zip across the horizon in very short time

I can see standardized satellite emergency services and messaging when the internet is unviable but not a replacement of our existing cellular network

11

u/griwulf 3d ago

Better battery, better camera, better chip, and since you're on 13P, you don't have the new (better) notch either. You see "virtually zero progress" because older iPhones get pretty much the same software features and updates as the new ones, except for the AI features which not a lot of people care about anyway. The design hasn't changed much either. So they basically look and feel the same. That said, the experience is objectively better but it may not be compelling enough for you to upgrade from 13 Pro of course. But I certainly would.

1

u/leopard_tights 2d ago

The experience in the real world is maybe 15% better for the vast majority of uses and people.

I had to use a second phone line for a while and put the number in my old iPhone 8 plus and I swear it was just fantastic. At no point did I sigh because it was slow. The biggest difference was night photos, which is the one thing that got a massive boost a couple of years ago. Photography in general is what you'll notice in these 3+ years upgrades. The reality is that iPhones have been very very good since the 7, before that the leaps on hardware were much bigger. It doesn't matter how big they are anymore because it just doesn't translate into real world benefits. Normal apps can't open any faster.

5

u/Chronixx 3d ago

13 Pros were and still are fantastic iPhones, among some of the best ever made. That being said, virtually zero progress is a bit of an exaggeration lol

1

u/Panda_hat 2d ago

You don't want multiple gigabytes of your storage taken up by AI features that don't work or you will never use?

1

u/DefinitelyNotDEA 1d ago

I have a 12 pro and I feel the same. Obviously there have been upgrades, but there's nothing compelling enough to buy a new phone, especially when mine is working well. In recent years, progress has been slow for iPhones, and most phones in general.

1

u/ZQ04 3d ago

I have the 14 Pro and the only thing I really want is USB C so I can have one cable for everything. It’s not worth a whole new phone though and I’ll probably keep this until the 18 series, maybe even longer.

1

u/Opposite-Knee-2798 3d ago

You don’t have devices with micro USB??? I have a bunch of them.

1

u/Anora6666 2d ago

I have very few micro usb devices left. Honestly just a kindle that I use relatively regularly. Maybe an xbox controller somewhere. But that’s going to be upgraded soonish. The only devices that use lightning for me are airpods and airpod pros that I honestly mostly just charge by induction at this point

I went from a 14 pro to 16 pro mostly to preserve the value and to utilize apple card installments. It’s essentially a free upgrade for me because my work pays enough for my service and acmi for my cell.

1

u/ZQ04 2d ago

I keep a few micro cables for the odd power bank or random Amazon appliance that uses it but all my main tech besides the phone is USB C. I think we’re definitely in the ending stages of the transition to C, a lot of my new stuff uses it and I haven’t bought anything recently that’s still on micro.

1

u/AppointmentNeat 3d ago

There isn’t a reason to update unless you want Ai. Phones have plateaued. The most you’ll get is spec bumps every year.

0

u/Hejabaar 2d ago

and a few years from now you’ll say the same thing about your iPhone 18 Pro.

-1

u/Portatort 2d ago

USB-C, Action Button, Dynamic Island.

USB-C really is enough all on its own tbh.

Although yeah, your phone is only 3-4 years old, absolutely no harm holding onto it another 2-5 if you’re happy

6

u/kadinshino 3d ago

100% sold if it feels like the iphone 11. otherwise skip then i wont have a phone ocne it dies.

1

u/xak47d 2d ago

The last iphone that felt like it wasn't trying to cut into your hand

4

u/amogl 3d ago

If they repositioned the cameras like in the mockup, surely that means they wouldn't be able to capture landscape spacial video? Isn't that why they repositioned the cameras on the iPhone 16?

1

u/brekky_sandy 2d ago

If this ends up being the camera array, you can just take spatial video in portrait mode. I’m guessing they’ll do some cropping or camera magic to capture a landscape recording.

4

u/Error-404_NotOnEarth 3d ago

They are probably doing this to relaunch the premium Titanium or Steel finish again in iPhone’s 20th anniversary. So downgrading the 3rd last iPhone before iPhone XX.

14

u/ZachMatthews 3d ago

Those camera bumps are an aesthetic failure. They really ought to just make the phones thicker with more battery so they can lie flat again. No one cares if a phone is as thin as a Triscuit.  Or, alternatively, just admit that everyone is getting a protective case and no one cares what the back metal looks like. I don’t even remember what color my phone is.  

23

u/Wizzer10 3d ago

This “make the battery thicker to match the camera bump” idea that gets thrown around on Reddit is nonsensical. Normal people don’t want 300g phones.

4

u/BosnianSerb31 3d ago

And it makes the device substantially thicker overall as most users use cases.

iPhone with 2-3mm worth of case to make it level with the camera bump? Now on the thicker phone proposal you need an additional 3mm of case for the same protection.

So it's not even "make it level the thickness won't matter because of the bump already being there", it's "make it level and those who use cases now have a phone that's a shitload harder to pocket".

Just get a big chunky battery case if you don't care about the thickness of your device smh

15

u/NeoliberalSocialist 3d ago

People love thin phones in normal circles. Nerds like us talking tech on reddit are a different, more niche consumer group.

0

u/BosnianSerb31 3d ago

The biggest thing is that the thicc level phone idea doesn't consider that everyone uses a case. So making the phone as thick as a protective when naked makes it extremely chunky if you want the same level of padding on the theoretical phone.

The counter is to build an iPhone that's like a tough book but that fails to consider how fucked up both cases and rugged devices get. And replacing a destroyed case is way easier and cheaper than replacing a destroyed chassis.

Ergo, a solid glass sandwich device to enable wireless charging, a metal chassis, and a protective case is the best mix of size, feature set, protection, and modularity for 99% of users.

Everyone charges their phone at night anyways, everyone else can carry a power bank and use low power mode. Mine can go a week in that state without touching a wall outlet.

2

u/kshiau 3d ago

Been rawdogging my deep purple cause the color is great to look at

-1

u/ZachMatthews 3d ago

Hahahah - the only reason not to have a case is if you have a wild lookin' phone.

2

u/rorowhat 3d ago

Innovation/s

2

u/querythoughtss 2d ago

I want to upgrade this year, I just hope it’s not that ugly in the picture shown above. I wouldn’t mind the same design as last year but even thinner bezels and a slightly smaller Dynamic Island. I’m not asking for much.

2

u/JKniz14 1d ago

That Camera orientation would not allow for landscape spatial video. I thought that was the reason iPhone 16s cameras are vertical?

4

u/IAmTaka_VG 3d ago

This rumour is 100% not true. You can’t have the cameras aligned like that and record spacial video.

1

u/gabriel197600 2d ago

I saw a YouTuber camera specialist say If all cameras are 48 Megapixels it would allows the cameras to be linear instead of stacked. The no idea of he’s right or not, but perhaps?

4

u/IAmTaka_VG 2d ago

I just don't see how they're going to reproduce the 3d spatial effect not offset. It's literally why he we have two eyes and they are positioned horizontally not vertically.

1

u/Alarmed_Influence_21 3d ago

Well, I’m rocking the iPhone SE, which is rounded like the old 8 was, and it’s a nightmare without a case on it, because of the rounded edges. I really like the squared off sides for gripping my phones.

1

u/Whit3boy316 2d ago

Can we make it less heavy? I’m kinda jealous of seeing Samsung with 3 cameras and weighing so much less.

1

u/lorddementor 2d ago

This looks like a Google pixel

1

u/7_Pillars_of_Wisdom 2d ago

Apple has not been innovative for over a decade now

1

u/DarkFate13 2d ago

Good i got the 16pm

1

u/XNY 17h ago

Big if true

1

u/Vegetable_Dream_5251 12h ago

That camera design gives me an ick

u/Aion2099 1h ago

This has got to be the least important feature detail of an upcoming phone ever. A smoother edge? Wow, sign me up!

1

u/dormantcouchcamper 3d ago

Wow what a revolutionary development

1

u/Far_Run8614 3d ago

The horizontal camera is so bullshit, particularly because they’ve just added the video mode for the Apple Vision Pro. I doubt that they’re going to rearrange the cameras in such a way so that the camera mode is completely useless, even though no one uses the Apple Vision Pro

1

u/FightOnForUsc 3d ago

Vertical spatial videos😂

0

u/shivaswrath 3d ago

Titanium has been awesome on 15PM. Strong and light, does get hot to touch when fast charging but dissipates easily.

Aluminum will be a rough step back.

-2

u/Hawker96 3d ago

For the love of God make the cameras flush with the phone. I’m so sick of the gigantic cameras!!! We don’t need 946MP sensors on a cell phone.

1

u/Wizzer10 3d ago

Outside of Reddit people actually like having good cameras. I don’t think you recognise the sacrifice you’d be making in quality to have flush cameras. Even the rumoured ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air isn’t expected to have a flush camera because a camera module that small would just be so much worse than what people expect from a high end or even midrange smartphone camera.

0

u/Portatort 2d ago

If we can actually address the content of the report for a second

Yes this is about as dull and uninspiring as this kind of news could ever be

But the lip between the case and the back on the 15 and 16 pros is noticeable.

Sharp almost.

I wondered if j had a bad unit when I unboxed my 15 pro

0

u/dreww84 2d ago

Aluminum is only a downgrade (and a visual one at that) if you carry your phone naked, which isn’t smart to begin with. I’ll take lighter weight, personally. But not thinner.

-4

u/ExactBee201 3d ago

iPhone 16 is my next year phone .. always stayed 1 or 2 models behind on the hardware lol (With the exceptions of XS and 14)

-8

u/OhOkYa 3d ago

It’s sad that these are the details we’re supposed to care about. Apple doesn’t need to introduce new models every year, truly. Give us a new iPhone every 3 years and make it an EVENT again.

9

u/PeaceBull 3d ago

How is them releasing iterative updates every year and you buying 1 out of 3 phones drastically different than them arbitrarily releasing 1 phone every three years?

1

u/rnarkus 3d ago

because FOMO

6

u/Wizzer10 3d ago

I am continually amazed by the business skills of Reddit commenters. iPhone sales would collapse if Apple was still selling a three year old iPhone for the same price as a newly introduced Samsung Galaxy or Google Pixel. It would be cataclysmic for iPhone revenue, the brand would never recover.

1

u/BosnianSerb31 3d ago

It's not the old days where cellphones had monumental changes every other release(back in the 4, 4s, 5, 5s) days, because the technology is close to as perfect as one can get when trying to make something satisfactory for as much of the population as possible.

Everyone will always have their own opinions on what should be done to make it perfect but one persons idea of perfection is another person idea of ruin. So it's made for the LCD.

I miss it too, but it really isn't gonna come back.

-1

u/OhOkYa 2d ago

It’s almost like we should stop trying to improve something that’s GOOD ENOUGH for a few years, and put that effort towards something else that could use improvement in peoples’ lives.

But hey, what do I know?

1

u/Chronixx 3d ago

Yes they do… what are you even talking about lol?