He’s literally advocating offshoring raising productive adults. He is saying to every single American have more kids no matter what (based on his other quotes) then saying but those kids will grow up in a society that does not care about them, support them, or invest in them.
In other words, he wants to replace Americans, which, just a few months ago he was saying liberals and Jews wanted to do this. The mental gymnastics is just exhausting with these idiots.
He wants to replace current immigrants in the fields with homegrown Americans, and then replace middle class Americans with immigrants that are easier to control
Literally trying to move us towards serfdom. Where everyone born here will go straight towards menial labor and poverty with no hope of advancement.
This actually makes a lot of sense with what he and Peter Thiel support - breaking up the country into a bunch of tiny territories each ruled over by an "elite male tech bro".
you don't remember how DOGE coin shot up in value after Melon's SNL appearance? It's obvious their plan is to bankrupt America, buy up the scraps and try to prop up Crypto as the new "global" currency
I dont think those cheap skilled workers are supposed to stay in his mind. Just come, work hard for peanuts to make him and his buddies richer then fuck off.
It’s almost like Elmo has no idea how systems work. How touching one part of the system has ripple effects to other parts of the system. Implicating that change as the root cause.
No, Elmo is a smarty pants nerd. He knows how systems work and how to properly make changes.
i have literally been saying this is the global neoliberal agend for a year now and people would say im being too conspiratorial. i also was talking about how ‘bernie was the compromise’ for 3 yeas now and what people domt realise and still dont talk about which i was also is that the reason why biden’s administration was the best since reagan is because they had to cave into bernie’s popularity and therefore brought him under their wing and followed some of his policies in order to keep public support. dont confuse kamala as being par of the same initiative, she is just another bootscum neocon who was brought in as a DEI hire to sway the hyper-progressive crowd.
People who are for DEI don't usually use it to describe a person. That just makes it another way to say "minority" and it's being used like a slur often. It's a right-wing racist dog whistle to call a PERSON a DEI hire. You're confusing people by using terminology of the right that makes you look racist. To them, DEI is not, "making sure more needs are met by having an initiative that supports inclusion by bringing in diverse perspectives". To them, DEI is "affirmative action", and to them, DEI and affirmative action are both just words for "giving things to minorities instead of white people just because they're minorities in spite of who has better credentials".
I don't really need you to explain your criticism to me, unfortunately. If you're being intentionally inflammatory to be able to have an excuse to preach at someone, the wrong person responded, I'm afraid. I'm actually not a person that didn't understand the concept you describe. I'm just a person who was kind enough to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you may not realize how using a right-wing racist dog whistle in your argument is actually obfuscating your points to the general public because they WILL care about HOW you say what you're saying, and they will see you as more suspicious and less trustworthy by default because you seem WAY too comfortable being openly racist sounding. Furthermore, the fact that you now seem like you were trying to bait someone into this discussion makes it look like you expected to take an educator position in the discussion, which comes off kind of arrogant and unlikable. It's not really a great way to convince most people of anything, even if you DO have a good point. You could be a super smart and lovely person in real life. I'm just letting you know how you seem to be coming off.
"There is clear value in DEI initiatives. They promote inclusivity and help with deconstructing some subconscious bias by allowing for multiple perspectives to be considered, which ultimately can strengthen ideas overall, so it's worth promoting for both ethical and practical reasons. That said, when a person seems to be chosen JUST because they tick certain boxes of seeming "diverse" enough, then it discredits the benefits of these initiatives and only ends up supporting the arguments of those who oppose DEI as a concept. It seems to me like Harris was picked as a marketing symbol instead of someone who truly had a lot to offer to the role."
You don't have to call a black woman a DEI hire to say that you have that opinion. Someone can still disagree with that, but at least you wouldn't seem suspiciously comfortable with racist verbiage.
How is Kamala a DEI hire? She has decades of government experience at the state and federal level. She had more experience in Congress alone than the rapist elect and his couch fucking sidekick have in any level of government combined. THEY are the fucking DEI hires, not her.
So you are saying that you can either be a DEI hire OR an appropriate hire? She can’t be both? I swear you guys sound more racist by the minute.
I clearly stated that I think she is a bad candidate due to the fact that she is a neocon bootscum. I swear just using the word DEI triggered you guys just as much as it does conservatives 🫠
You’re right, I’m clearly racist for pointing out that the black woman was far more experienced and qualified than the spoiled rich white man and it’s insulting to call someone with that level of experience a DEI hire. What was I thinking?
Okay you literally misunderstand what DEI is, it’s about putting minorities in important positions because in the past they haven’t been allowed to be in these positions due to prejudice.
It’s not about taking unqualified individuals and putting them in such positions solely due to the fact that they are minorities
Your perspective of what DEI is and what it is trying to achieve is actually extremely offensive to minorities and is the exact same perspective as those who oppose DEI.
To say that you are either an appropriate hire OR a DEI hire is misunderstanding what DEI is in the same racist and malicious manner that conservatives do.
So Kamala is literally a DEI hire because in the past, someone as experienced as her wouldn’t be allowed to be put into the position she was in 2024 even though she is qualified due to prejudice.
Do you understand now how your view of the DEI system is EXACTLY the same as the racist conservatives that you rightfully complain about? Or do I have to explain it in an even more longwinded manner?
Anyway I am not partaking in this conversation anymore because you’re straight up spewing racist rhetoric that plays right into the hand of those who oppose DEI.
734
u/Teamerchant 1d ago
He’s literally advocating offshoring raising productive adults. He is saying to every single American have more kids no matter what (based on his other quotes) then saying but those kids will grow up in a society that does not care about them, support them, or invest in them.
This is beyond an insane take.