Trump Concerned If He Beats Kamala In Debate They Might Replace Her With Someone Good This Time

[u/thatrightwinger]

https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-concerned-if-he-beats-kamala-in-debate-they-might-replace-her-with-someone-good-this-time

[u/Nightmare_Ives]

He has changed though. He's now a convict.

That's... something...?

[u/GeneticsGuy → u/Nightmare_Ives]

With this logic any of the thousands of DAs that exist in the United States could bring charges against literally any opponent in the country and charge them on anything they wanted with their prosecutorial discretion, then convict them. It doesn't matter if it gets overturned by the upper courts later, you get to call that person a "convict" now.

If you can't see that the prosecutorial actions of a hard left DA that campaigned on prosecuting Trump and finding anything, then bringing charges in a zip-code that is 95% Democrat, violating all legal norms to reach for any kind of charges possible, just so they can say "Trump is a convict" then you are allowing your personal bias to cloud your judgement. Everyone knows it was political prosecution to muddy the water and taint Trump's name to hurt him. It doesn't matter if it eventually gets overturned. In an election year, they successfully got people like you to say "He's now a convict." This is a manipulation, and you are either allowing it because of your bias, or you are allowing it because of the lack of will to question official narratives of the media. Either way, you are just allowing the media to insult your intelligence and treat you like an NPC. Be better.

[u/Nightmare_Ives → u/GeneticsGuy]

And why shouldn't they? Every retaliatory "impeachment" attempt so far has gone no where.

Where the fuck is Coomer and his take down of the Biden crime family? All this shit we got promised night after night?

He's either in on it and corrupt, or he's incompetent.

Either way, the prosecution brought enough evidence to convict Trump. Doesn't really matter how the Right tries to spin it. What happened to integrity? What happened to honor? What happened to leading our country to a brighter future? Where is any of that?

I say we need a better candidate or a better message.

[u/The_Asian_Viper → u/Nightmare_Ives]

That's just seeing things without context, like NY changing the law to prosecute Trump. Also, law is different from immoral. It was once legal to own slaves and illegal to sell alcohol. A conviction on its own without reasoning is a pretty weak argument. About Trump not draining the swamp, it's not that easy and some things cannot be done by the president alone in one term.

That being said, I'd rather have Desantis but I don't think Trump is a bad candidate at all.

[u/GeneticsGuy → u/Nightmare_Ives]

I would challenge you by saying they brought enough evidence to convict. They would have convicted with ZERO evidence, which is actually what they had.

This also ignorantly assumes that a prosecution is making their case on sound legal principles. A DA can literally invent a crime, which they did here, and then prosecute someone without evidence as long as they have a pliable jury willing to convict no matter what. Or, have you somehow missed the thousands of cases wrongfully and dishonestly prosecuted over the years?

What happened to our country not prosecuting political opponents? Do you not even realize that the United States is now only the 2nd first-world nation in history to persecute and convict a political opponent in History? The only other case of it being in Spain, which was ultimately thrown out of the courts on reverse as political prosecution. This is not a good look for the United States and an absolute embarrassment for us to the rest of the world. We look like a 3rd world country doing this, and that is exactly what we are becoming. We criticized Russia for stuff like this.

No, this is the slippery slope to destroying our country.

[u/[deleted] → u/GeneticsGuy]

[removed] — view removed comment

[u/AIDS_Quilt_69 → u/Nightmare_Ives]

Like anyone cares about the lawfare...

[u/Nightmare_Ives → u/AIDS_Quilt_69]

The party of "law and order"?

I guess that means we only care when the law applies to the outgroups, though. When it applies to the ingroup, we are a bit more lax.

[u/AIDS_Quilt_69 → u/Nightmare_Ives]

Making up crimes and siccing the system on him isn't "law and order".

[u/Nightmare_Ives → u/AIDS_Quilt_69]

He got convicted. There was evidence. Trump had lawyers, too. "THE BEST ONES".

So is this the plan? We don't win, so we cry "not fair"?

Horseshit.

[u/AIDS_Quilt_69 → u/Nightmare_Ives]

Of a supposed crime that the DA illegally upgraded to a felony and ignored the statute of limitations on. A crime Democrats are not prosecuted for. In a deep blue city. The governor of the state had to assure other businessmen that they weren't going to be persecuted like this, that they were only going after Trump.

Why did Hillary Clinton not get prosecuted for her illegal server? Why didn't her husband get prosecuted for paying off his hoes? Why was Biden not prosecuted for influenced peddling and mishandling classified documents.

Isn't your party always going on about how the justice system is rigged? This is another example of it.

And your party is already saying it won't accept it if Trump wins, that it will start a civil war for the second time over it.