r/BlueOrigin • u/Obvious_Shoe7302 • 1d ago
Blue Origin and SpaceX competing to see who can delay the most.
47
u/ContraryConman 1d ago edited 1d ago
If they're delaying for weather/conditions and they're launching from roughly the same place, it makes sense that both would delay
E: Starship is from TX though, my bad
24
u/paulhockey5 1d ago
Starship launches from Texas
23
u/MajorRocketScience 1d ago
They were both hit by the same cold front that’s causing massively increased winds
4
u/kaninkanon 1d ago
Well Blue Origin is cancelling due to the weather conditions downrange at the landing site, not at their launch site ..
22
5
u/ICYprop 1d ago
One is in TX and the other is FL.
6
1
u/ContraryConman 1d ago
Oh oops, I thought they were both launching from Cape Canaveral
5
u/Simon_Drake 1d ago
Falcon 9 launches from pads that are ~10 and ~15 miles away from New Glenn's pad in Cape Canaveral. And SpaceX did build some infrastructure for launching Starship from Pad 39A in Florida. But then the first Starship launch from Texas ripped the launch site apart and they've been reconsidering the pad design. There's a second launchpad (third overall) being built in Texas next to their original (repaired) pad but it's of a brand new design. I think after they're comfortable with the design of the second Texas pad they'll go back to rebuild the Florida pad with the new design.
7
u/TitaniumShadow 1d ago
“You will never remember the many times the launch slipped, but the on-time failures are with you always.” – Walt Williams.
22
10
22
u/omgitsbees 1d ago
better safe than sorry. neither are Boeing, they care about their reputation and safety.
34
u/rustybeancake 1d ago
Yeah Boeing are known for launching on time and never having any delays 👀
12
u/SeattleOligarch 1d ago
🤣🤣 There is two astronauts in space that would like a word with Boeing's safety team.
7
u/RandyBeaman 1d ago
Does anyone know why they are targeting 1am local? Being a test flight I wouldn't think they need to hit a specific orbit and obviously it's much easier to track the launch and landing in the daytime.
8
8
u/Master_Engineering_9 1d ago
most likely because it's easier to clear the launch area during that time and go about issues during the day while most of the mechanics, manufacturing engineers etc are there.
1
u/whitelancer64 1d ago
It's not any easier to track the launch / landing in the daytime. Radar and telemetry work regardless of the time of day.
1
u/acrewdog 19h ago
Both Shuttle failures were found to be tied back to launch issues that were detected with optical cameras. Optical failure analysis was important in understanding the Vulcan launch issue last year. Sure, we have infrared but sunlight makes visualization of the vehicle much easier.
2
1
1
u/GreenGoldNeon 1d ago
Booooo
2
u/Planck_Savagery 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yeah, we've all been there. (Mother Nature can be really fickle at times).
Best thing Blue can do is wait for the storm to blow over (and for the weather forecast to improve).
-15
u/maxehaxe 1d ago
I mean this battle is still open, nonetheless the overall war is decided already.
15
2
u/goldman60 1d ago
If it were 1985 you probably would have called the race for the computer for IBM instead of Amiga lmao
1
u/acrewdog 19h ago
I'd call New Glenn a competitor of Falcon 9, Vulcan, and Ariane 6 rather than a competitor to Starship.
21
u/ActuallyUnder 1d ago
It might not go on the 12th either. First flight and all. We shouldn’t be surprised by a scrub during terminal countdown because I’m sure there are a million sensors that are going to be set very conservatively.
But, it will fly, it’s just if matter of time now. Soon. And soon enough it will be the 2nd flight, and the 10th flight.
The waiting is honestly kind of fun. Like a kid waiting for Christmas.